Methodology v1.3.0 · effective 2026-08-15
How Passport carbon figures are calculated
This page is written to be handed to an auditor, a customs broker or a buyer's sustainability team. Every Customs & Carbon Slip prints the methodology version it was issued under, so a figure issued today stays reproducible even after the factor sets move on.
The calculation
Distance comes from the actual AIS satellite track for the voyage, not a port-pair estimate. Mass comes from the Bill of Lading where available. The efficiency multiplier (0.7–1.5) is derived from the vessel's age, size class and propulsion from the IMO registry.
Method hierarchy (GHG Protocol Scope 3, Cat. 4 & 9)
The Protocol permits three calculation methods for transportation and distribution and ranks them by data quality. Sellexio always applies the highest-quality method the evidence supports, prints the rationale on the slip, and names what evidence would unlock a better one.
1. Fuel-based method
PCAF 1–2Emissions = Σ (fuel consumption × emission factor × allocation share)Used when Bunker Delivery Notes or a carrier fuel report evidence the actual burn. The whole-ship figure is allocated to the cargo on a tonne-kilometre share.
2. Distance-based method (GLEC)
PCAF 2–4Emissions = Σ (distance × weight × mode factor) × vessel efficiency multiplierThe Passport default. Used when the sailed AIS distance and Bill of Lading mass are known but no metered fuel figure exists.
3. Spend-based method
PCAF 5Emissions = Σ (spend × emission factor per spend)Last resort where neither fuel nor movement data exists. Reported as an economic proxy and never used for a CBAM embedded-emissions declaration.
Factor sets and vintages
GLEC Framework v3 — tonne-kilometre default factors
2023 editionOcean, road, rail and air freight legs (well-to-wheel)
Source: Smart Freight Centre, Global Logistics Emissions Council Framework v3.0 — reference
IPCC AR6 global warming potentials (GWP100)
AR6, 2021Conversion of all Kyoto greenhouse gases to CO₂e
Source: IPCC Sixth Assessment Report, Working Group I, Chapter 7
PCAF data quality scoring (1–5)
Part A, 2nd editionGrading each calculation input from measured to assumed
Source: Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials, Global GHG Accounting Standard
Sellexio AIS voyage distance and vessel efficiency register
Rolling — rebuilt on every satellite sweepActual great-circle track distance, vessel age, size and propulsion multipliers
Source: Sellexio AIS ingestion pipeline and IMO vessel registry lookups
EU CBAM definitive-period reporting rules
2026 obligationsGoods in scope, embedded emissions declaration, certificate position
Source: Regulation (EU) 2023/956 and implementing acts
Against the five GHG Protocol principles
- Relevance
- Figures cover Scope 3 Category 4/9 upstream transport for the specific container on the slip — not a company-wide average allocated down.
- Completeness
- All legs of the movement carried in the booking are calculated. Legs outside the Passport (e.g. shipper-arranged first mile) are named as excluded rather than silently dropped.
- Consistency
- One pinned methodology version per slip. Factor changes ship as a new version with a dated changelog entry; historic slips keep the version they were issued under.
- Transparency
- Each slip prints the inputs, the factor used, the multiplier basis and the source of every value, so the total can be recomputed by hand.
- Accuracy
- Measured AIS distance and Bill of Lading mass are preferred over defaults; where a default is used it is disclosed and graded under PCAF so the uncertainty is visible.
What is excluded
- · Downstream distribution after customs release, unless purchased as an added leg.
- · Packaging, warehousing and terminal handling energy — reported separately, not inside the tonne-km figure.
- · Offsets and certificates: Passport reports gross emissions only; retired credits are never netted off.
Changelog
- v1.3.02026-08-15
GHG Protocol method hierarchy for Category 4/9 transport
All three permitted calculation methods are now implemented — fuel-based (fuel consumed × fuel factor, with cargo allocation), distance-based (GLEC tonne-kilometre) and spend-based (spend × factor per spend). The engine selects the highest-quality method the evidence supports, discloses the rationale, and names the evidence needed to unlock a better one. Spend-derived figures are graded PCAF 5 and flagged as unfit for CBAM filing.
- v1.2.02026-08-01
Published a versioned methodology register
Each slip now carries a methodology version stamp, the cited factor sets with their vintage, and a statement against the five GHG Protocol principles so an auditor can reproduce any figure from the issued document alone.
- v1.1.02026-07-18
PCAF data quality scoring added to every calculation
Every input is graded 1–5 (AIS-measured track = 1, Bill of Lading mass = 2, default assumption = 5). Slips report a weighted score, the share of inputs at PCAF 1–3, and plain-English steps to improve the grade.
- v1.0.02026-07-02
GLEC tonne-kilometre engine
Voyage carbon calculated as mass (tonnes) × distance (km) × GLEC default factor (g CO₂e/tonne-km) × vessel efficiency multiplier (0.7–1.5), using AIS track distance rather than port-pair estimates.